The American University of Rome

HST 201 - Survey of Western Civilization I - Fall 2008


Take-home exam 2

Exam questions posted on 10/13, due, by email and paper, before 10.30am on 10/20


This second Take-home exam with consist in two questions, of which you will answer one. Answering one question is obligatory.

However, you have the option to answer the second question that will count in stead of the questions of the mid-term exam of Wednesday October 22. How will the mid-term be organized? The mid-term will consist in four short questions of which you will choose to three to answer in class. If you decide to answer the second question in this second take-home exam you will just need to answer two questions in the mid-term exam. I am sure you will gauge (legal) "strategies" along the term to maximize your results. Should you wish to answer both questions, remember that the ONE obligatory question of this take-home exam (that I will consider as the first one answered) and the OTHER question (the second question answered) that would count towards the mid-term do have the same weight: 7.5 points. The advantage? You have one week to answer a question, instead of the 25-30mn on the day of the exam.

This is what I call a "control" take-home exam: you and I will be able to build on your performance of the first take-home exam. Those of you who demonstrated good writing skills and a good grasp on the concepts of the course should be able to repeat their performance, and I, on my part, confirm that you are reading the textbook, your notes, and reviewing the power-point modules on a periodical basis.

For those who had problems in the first take-home (some of you mentioned the time problems, and indeed it shows when a take-home question is written in a speedy manner) you will be able to make progress on your previous performance. Where do the problems lie? Two aspects: structure of the answer and use of adjectives and "grand" or colloquial wording. First, answers should have a three-part structure: introduction, body (where the will be one paragraph for each idea, stage, concept described) and conclusion. This structure makes for a clearer reading, but mostly, it allows you the writer to organize better and restrict the writing to the idea developed in the answer. Second, the clarity, precision and adequacy of the words is essential. Here is a sample of weak sentences (in no particular order of, say, barbarism) obtained from the first exams (authorship withheld by request of the authors).

"The transition from ‘barbarism’ to civilization is usually seen as a linear transition with hunter gather societies at the beginning of the line and a state and empire at the end of the line."

"The near east, during the year 1500 B.C.E, was a region where humanity flourished."

"In the Sumerian civilization religion encompassed all way of life."

"The Persian Empire emerged out of a period where the near east was ruled by the incredibly cruel Assyrian and Chaldean empires."

"The transition from the chiefdoms to states was inevitable..."

"I think many societies can shift through time because of knowledge."
|
"Why did it take so long for complex states to emerge? Mostly because of food, resources, the lack of communication and technology..."

"It could be argued that the western culture (in particular, that of the United States of America) seems to be currently transitioning from a monotheistic culture to a polytheistic culture."

"The Persian Wars started from the Persians wanting to take over Italy and France

"In all strata of the world, in each individual ethnic group, few defining features can be labeled. Civilization, as it pertains the government, is one such feature."

"...religion played little to no role in the ancient Mesopotamian world."

"Nevertheless, religion did impact every aspect of early society, a fact that will be proven below."

"The Mediterranean during the 1500 B.C. was a particularly busy place..."

 

As with the first exam, I do not expect “right” answers to these questions. Instead, I want you to exercise the concepts, the historical evidence, and some critical thinking regarding politics and economics of prehistoric societies. Please try to be as specific, complete, clear, and concise as possible. Decide on definite positions or answers, then convince me that they are correct by laying out arguments and specific evidence that support them.

I do not expect you to do additional research for this essay, although you are welcome to do so if you wish. Using evidence from the readings, class notes, and slides is sufficient. Online sources are OK if they are reliable, academic sources like the article databases available through the library website or websites of most domains that end in “.edu”.
 

Completing the exam

For administrative reasons, the exam will handed back, completed, BOTH on paper, AND as a file attached to an email message to me. I will return the paper copy with short comments and a grade written on it. The paper copy is due in class on the 10/20. The computer file OF THE IDENTICAL PAPER should reach me before the class starts. I must have BOTH versions to give you credit. Name the file in this format: SWC1-08-TH1-LastnameFirstname. Replace “LastnameFirstname” with your name, last name first, capitalizing the first letter of each name. Your word processor may add a 3-letter file extension like “.doc” or “.wks”.

Format and citations: Computer print your essay in 12 point type, double spaced or space-and-a-half. Five pages should be sufficient to complete all the questions (Reserve 11/4 page for each answer). Your writing should be grammatically correct, properly spelled, and in clearly written. Please do not waste your limited space by quoting or summarizing definitions except as needed to refer to them.

In this case of this exam, unlike the research paper, full citations of references are not needed, proper identification of authors, places, theories  and necessary details of facts and ideas is needed to support your argument. All information and ideas, including the definitions, must be properly cited in the text.

 

Pool of two questions (You have to choose one)

You may answer both questions in order to make your mid-term exam lighter)


Question 1

How many stages can you establish in the management strategies of the Roman empire? You could mention the events that lead to each period of restructuration, whether they are positive or negative for the subsistence of the Roman Empire (as we know it from its inception in 27 BC). You may also mention, to further strengthen your answer, those political decisions that, on the contrary, worked against the integrity of that imperial polity (and that led to the formation of other polities).


Question 2

Christianity will we essential in the evolution of Mediterranean societies from the earliest decades of our era. Describe its process of formation amidst the political social structure of the Roman empire. What is essential here is the relationship of Christianity and its followers in a polytheistic world, how it finds itself with the Roman world, how it expands its flocks in the regions, and how it eventually becomes the official religion of the empire. You will mainly rely on your reading of the textbook, but also use the table and map that we reviewed in session 10 (Wednesday 10 Oct.) and the information obtained by your brief (and strategic) reading of the paper by Sanders (reading for Monday 8 Oct.).

 

T.M. Finn, Mission and Expansion of Christianity. In The Early Christian World. Ed. Philip Francis Esler 2000, p. 296.
 
Figure 9-4. Jeffery Siker, Christianity in the second and third centuries. In The Early Christian World. Ed. Philip Francis Esler 2000, p. 243.


Notes on plagiarism & copying

> AUR's Academic policies & integrity (Word format)
> Bruce Owen (Sonoma State University) on plagiarism
(Pdf format)
 

© 2008 Higueras & AUR