Table 1. Recorded and Estimated Occupation Size
by Soil Zone in Capinota.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size in Total Survey Areaa |
|
|
|
|
Early Intermediate |
Size Recordeda |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Sizea |
|
|
| |
|
Middle Horizon |
Size Recorded |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Size |
|
|
|
Table 2. Recorded and Estimated
Occupation Size by Topographic Zone in Capinota.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size in Total Survey Areaa |
|
|
|
|
Early Intermediate |
Size Recordeda |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Sizea |
|
|
| |
|
Middle Horizon |
Size Recorded |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Size |
|
|
|
Table 3. Recorded and Estimated
Occupation Size by Soil Zone in Mizque.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size in Total Survey Areaa |
|
|
|
|
Early Intermediate |
Size Recordeda |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Sizea |
|
|
| |
|
Middle Horizon |
Size Recorded |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Size |
|
|
|
Table 4. Recorded and Estimated
Occupation Size by Topographic Zone in Mizque.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size in Total Survey Areaa |
|
|
|
|
Early Intermediate |
Size Recordeda |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Sizea |
|
|
| |
|
Middle Horizon |
Size Recorded |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Size |
|
|
|
Table 5: Summary of the Results of
Comparisons Between Capinota and Mizque.
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
Differences in Total Estimated Occupation Size? |
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
Preferential Occupation by Soil or Topography Zone? |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
Increase in Percentage of Occupation of Soil or Topography Zone? |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Increase in Total Estimated Occupation Size? |
|
No |
No | ||||||||||
|
Site Location Changes from EIP to MH? |
|
| |||||||||||
|
Exclusive Local Style occupation in MH? Exclusive Tiwanaku style? |
|
| |||||||||||